gene,0,0 GSM1624228,0,292702 GSM1868817,0,185964 GSM1868818,0,11221 GSM1868819,0,66298 GSM1868820,0,470366 GSM1868821,0,143821 GSM1868822,0,251282 GSM1868823,0,154675 GSM1624232,0,248434 GSM1868810,0,231757 GSM1868811,0,120083 GSM1868812,0,243844 GSM1868813,0,109017 GSM1868814,0,443523 GSM1624222,0,183170 GSM1624223,0,255337 GSM1624224,0,99837 GSM1624225,0,231780 GSM1624226,0,87846 GSM1624227,0,256141 GSM1624229,0,730675 GSM1624230,0,137294 GSM1624231,0,87383 GSM1624233,0,128137 GSM1624234,0,64227 GSM1624235,0,126439 GSM1624236,0,72466 GSM1624237,0,896814 GSM1868815,0,118229 GSM1868816,0,129713
MT-ND4 expression in each cell group | Minimum Value (Read count) | Median Value (Read count) | Maximum Value (Read count) |
---|---|---|---|
Epiblast | 11,221 | 170,319.5 | 470,366 |
Primitive Endoderm | 109,017 | 237,800.5 | 443,523 |
Trophectoderm | 64,227 | 128,925 | 896,814 |
Comparing MT-ND4 expression between groups | FDR |
---|---|
Epiblast VS Primitive Endoderm | NS |
Epiblast VS Trophectoderm | NS |
Primitive Endoderm VS Trophectoderm | NS |
Top correlated genes were calculated by using Spearman rank correlation. Enrichment analysis can be performed on DAVID server using its API, while alternative links are also provided.
KEGG GO Others Epiblast[8]
Primitive Endoderm[6]
Trophectoderm[16]